Hernia mesh complication claims

Hernia mesh claims allege that certain implanted meshes were defectively designed or inadequately warned about, causing adhesion, migration, infection, bowel obstruction, chronic pain and — most importantly for eligibility — revision surgery to remove or repair the device.

Reviewed by Omar A. Cooper, Esq. · Last updated September 3, 2026

What the litigation is about

The FDA publishes information on hernia surgical mesh, including the complications most frequently reported and the recalls that have occurred. Not every mesh is part of the litigation, and identifying the specific device is the first real step.

Revision surgery is the practical threshold in most of these claims: it establishes both that something went wrong and what it cost.

Who may qualify

Eligibility in this litigation generally turns on:

• implantation of a hernia mesh device that is part of the litigation;
• a complication such as infection, adhesion, migration, perforation, obstruction or chronic pain;
• in most cases, a revision or removal surgery;
• the deadline running from the complication rather than the original implant, depending on the state.

What we will ask you for

A review moves quickly when you have these to hand — and none of them are required to call:

• the operative report for the original implant, which names the device;
• the product sticker or implant card, if you were given one;
• the operative report for any revision surgery;
• imaging showing migration, adhesion or recurrence;
• the record of ongoing treatment for chronic pain.

No outcome can be promised in any mass tort, and eligibility is not the same as recovery. What an eligibility review gives you is a straight answer about whether a claim exists and whether it is worth pursuing.

Sources: FDA — hernia surgical mesh implants · U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation — pending MDL statistics

Common questions